Deschutes Estuary: Port wants state funding and for sediment mitigation included in interlocal agreement

Posted

The Port of Olympia wants state funding for a sediment mitigation structure to be included in the interlocal agreement for the Deschutes Estuary restoration project.

The Port Commission expressed this when it adopted a resolution on Monday, September 11, stating that the Port wanted to be involved in developing an interlocal agreement for the funding, governance and management of the Deschutes Estuary.

The Washington State Department of Enterprise Services (DES) is currently spearheading a project to remove the Capitol Lake Dam and restore the lake into an estuary. The project is being developed in partnership with the Department of Natural Resources, Thurston County, Olympia, Tumwater, Squaxin Island Tribe, and LOTT Clean Water Alliance.

The parties involved in the project currently have a non-binding memorandum of understanding outlining the preliminary governance and funding of the project, so the next step would be to develop an interlocal agreement.

Part of the Port’s resolution states that the Port wants the interlocal agreement to include funding to implement a sediment mitigation structure that could replace the catchment function of Capitol Lake.

The Port of Olympia further believes the interlocal agreement must specifically include state funding to implement a sediment mitigation structure of the scale and scope necessary to replace the catchment function served by the north basin of Capitol Lake,” the resolution specifically stated.

The commission also approved a second resolution expressing its support toward a watershed-wide approach to restoring the Deschutes Estuary.

The second resolution states that the costs of both the estuary restoration and the Budd Inlet sediment remediation projects can be equitably distributed among the parties involved in the project. The cleanup of Budd Inlet is a separate project by the Port as ordered by the Department of Ecology. However, the timing of this cleanup is crucial to the removal of the dam and the restoration of the estuary.

The Port of Olympia believes the Capitol LakeDeschutes Estuary Long-Term Management Plan Estuary Alternative and Budd Inlet sediment remediation can be implemented with mutual support among the parties involved and with costs and benefits equitably distributed,” a portion of the second resolution stated.

These two resolutions left an impression that the Port wanted other jurisdictions to share the cost of dredging in Budd Inlet, which at least two people opposed during public comments. Tumwater Resident Carla Wulfsberg rejected the idea, saying that it implied that the Port was confident about the profitability of its marine operations.

Engineering needs 

Commissioner Joe Downing emphasized that the resolution, the first one specifically, calls for an engineering solution to mitigate the influx of sediment into Budd Inlet once the Capitol Lake Dam is removed.

“What we want to try to do in the design of the bridge removal and estuary creation is create a way to capture the sediment more easily, so that's really an engineering question,” Downing said

“It's not really a funding question in my opinion. The overall DES design is for the state to pay for the actual work all the way up to once the work is completed, then turn it over to all the local municipalities to maintain the existing conditions,” Downing added.

Environmental consultant Jim Maul echoed Downing and clarified that the dredging component of the project would be separate from the construction of a sediment mitigation facility.

Comments

3 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • bonaro

    The State will balk and the Port will sue...the Port will win and rake in 100's of millions of taxpayer dollars to perform dredging in the inlet when they could have just dredged the lake as was intended when it was built.

    DERT will vanish and hold no responsibility.

    If you have been following my messages for the last 2 years...I have been saying this exact scenario would happen.

    Friday, September 15 Report this

  • Bobwubbena

    The resolutions by the Port and the MOU requiring definition of how both the initial construction and the annual/required on going maintenance of the sediment control program is what the DES and the EIS inferred but kept silent on the true cost of both. The cost comparison by DES between the Managed Lake and the Estuary Alternatives were "bogus" and misleading to avoid acknowledging a probable 10 to 1 cost difference. The Estuary will cost at least 10 times more than the Managed Lake and create an even larger ongoing maintenance cost that the State should pay for. This was pointed out during the draft EIS process, comments documented by the public and promptly ignored by the State/DES. Their cost also did not reflect the new risk the Estuary will create to the flooding of downtown when the 5th avenue flood management system is destroyed. The Port has every right to require the State/DES agree to the next 50 years of maintenance cost rather than the taxpayers of Thurston County and cities of Olympia, Tumwater, and LOTT rate payers.

    Friday, September 15 Report this

  • Deanima

    Perhaps the Port and yacht club should pay the state for 75 years of providing a free sediment trap. The state owes you nothing. The terminal is a boondoggle, anyway.

    Saturday, September 16 Report this