Thanks Mr. Gear for your insights and analysis.
An important point missed by the article but made by the complainants is the improper use of pictures of buildings on fire and people on stretchers. How do those emotionally charged images square up with a dispassionate neutral presentation designed to inform, not influence voters' decisions?
The complainants say that there is published PDC guidance that specifically does not allow such images. More than half of the space on the flyer was for pictures.
Images such as the timeline for the implementation of the proposal or the structure of the RFA Board that would eventually be elected would be a neutral and factual description of the proposal.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
