Each City pays for a City attorney, with out tax dollars. Is the City attorney a mere figure head? Shouldn't't the City attorneys earn their salaries by defending the City? This is a case involving what should be within the grasp of a City attorney's knowledge. Municipal law,
Instead the Cities are now hiring a private attorney with out tax dollars to defend itself. Perhaps the Cities should find and hire City Attorneys' that are competent in municipal law able to defend the City.
First they waste tax dollars on the RFA and now again. When does it end?
Any taxpayers feeling ripped off?
Please explain the inappropriate content below.