The existing court building was opened in 1978. That makes it 46 years old. How can it have been so poorly maintained that it needs a new roof? How can a huge building project have more of a cost benefit than just replacing an inefficient HVAC system? How can replacing an entire building complex be more cost beneficial than replacing out-dated technology? This project seems like utter madness. I, for one, am not buying the stated motivations for building new as opposed to maintaining existing. I smell a rat.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
