Report Inappropriate Comments

I hope we who oppose the RFA will activate supporting Larry Dzieza and Jim Lazar. We can't win being a bunch of one-off ranters. Let them shape the campaign's argument, then let us get out there door-to-door to defeat the RFA monster. I can't decide if I'm opposed because 1) the RFA is absurdly funded by a tax on structures when its work is primarily on crashed vehicles, injured persons and transient encampment fires, or 2) the tax structure is so complicated it missed counting 10 skyscrapers worth of commercial square footage less than six months ago, or 3) smoothly functioning mutual assistance policies invalidate all the economies-of-scale pro-RFA arguments I've heard, or 4) fire protection is a core municipal function. If a municipality determines it cannot provide this independently, perhaps it should dis-incorporate? or 5) The RFA is government deliberately bypassing the 1% levy limits in the Washington State Constitution by creating a new taxing district. I don't like governments dissing on voter intent. Looking forward to the concise argument to beat the RFA beast.

From: Regional Fire Authority Planning Committee appoints 5 to advocate pro and con positions

Please explain the inappropriate content below.