This paragraph really bothers me. Sounds like money and a new name are top of the list of importance and not the actual workings of staff and service to the communities involved. Isn't that backwards? Maybe even self-serving?
"Most of the materials provided by the RFA committee focus on issues such as budgets, staffing levels and costs, and even what to call an eventual RFA, rather than presenting concrete plans for faster response times, more emergency medical technicians, more fire stations, ambulance-type services or other potential improvements that might justify to the public a new ownership structure for these city fire departments. "
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
